To enable a GP to diagnose a patient symptoms and to provide advice on how to treat the patient it may be necessary to carry out an examination and in some cases an intimate examination. Where an intimate examination is necessary consideration should be given to the presence of a chaperone.
The general medical Council, in providing guidance to GPs states that when a GP carries out an intimate examination they should offer the patient the option of having an impartial observer (a chaperone) present, wherever possible. This condition, to an intimate examination, applies whether or not the GP is the same gender as the patient.
How can I get help?
If you have suffered harm as a result of a mistake or error and would like to know if you may be entitled to medical negligence compensation, call 0333 123 9099, email email@example.com or use the enquiry form to request a call back.
A chaperone should usually be a health professional. The GP must be satisfied that the chaperone will:
- Be sensitive and respect the patient dignity and confidentiality
- reassure the patient if they show signs of distress or discomfort
- be familiar with the procedures involved in a routine intimate examination
- stay for the whole examination and be able to see what the doctor is doing, if practical
- be prepared to raise concerns if they are concerned about the doctors behaviour or actions
the GMC state that a relative or friend of the patient is not an impartial observer and so would not usually be a suitable chaperone. However, the GMC also makes clear that the GP should comply with a reasonable request to have a relative or friend present in the consulting room, as well as a chaperone.
If either GP or the patient does not want the examination to go ahead without a chaperone present, or if either the GP or patient is uncomfortable with the choice of chaperone, the GP may offer to delay the examination to a later date, when a suitable chaperone will be available, provided the delay will not adversely affect the patient’s health.
If the GP doesn’t want to go ahead without a chaperone present in the room, but the patient doesn’t want a chaperone, the GP must explain clearly why they require a chaperone to be present. Ultimately, the patient’s clinical needs must take precedence. The GP may want to think about referring the patient to a colleague would be willing to examine them without a chaperone, as long as a delay would not adversely affect the patient’s health
The GMC make clear that the GP must record any discussion about chaperones and the outcome in the patient’s medical record. If a chaperone is present the GP should recall that fact and make a note of their identity. If the patient does not want a chaperone, the GP she recalled that the offer was made and declined.
It was said in the second trial at the Old Bailey that Dr Manish Shah, GP from Romford, who practised at the Mawney Medical Centre breached guidelines on the use of chaperones during intimate examinations.
Dr Myles Bradbury, a former paediatric haematologist at Addenbrooke’s Hospital in Cambridge, was able to avoid detection due to, what was described as, an “inadequate” chaperone policy. Dr Bradbury sexually abused children in his care.
What our Clients have said about what we do
IBB Claims Solicitors have acted for many adults and children across the country, who have been sexually assaulted or sexually abused. We do not reveal their identity but are grateful for many of them who have expressed their gratitude for our support, in enabling them to obtain justice. We listen to our clients and fight for them. This is what some of our clients have had to say.
“My experience with IBB Solicitors was excellent from the first phone call right until the end. They don’t give up. They fight all the way to get you justice. Malcolm Underhill took my case and ran with it…”
“Precise information to me on time and at all times. Really felt they were getting the best result for me”.
"We will be forever grateful for your kind and sensitive handling of (the) case and I will, of course, have no hesitation in recommending you and IBB to any other unfortunate individual should we come across them."
“I would recommend IBB Solicitors as they were very clear from the beginning as to the process, timescale and commitment required to obtain a positive outcome. They were also instrumental in providing the platform for me to work through the experiences I had been through by putting me in touch with the right professional persons”
(Malcolm Underhill) “always very considerate, supportive and encouraging from the outset and always had a positive opinion that I could work through this and come out with a more positive mind frame. I truly believe Malcolm had as much interest in my personal well-being as he did in obtaining the compensation fee. Without Malcolm’s consistent support and guidance to me and my parents, I am sure I would not be in the positive position I find myself in today”.
“My experience with IBB solicitors was fantastic, my case was a very sensitive one dating back to my childhood but was dealt with in a way that I could only have wished for”.
IBB solicitors are recommended because of providing “concise and precise information to me on time and at all times. Really felt they were getting the best result for me”.
(Malcolm Underhill) - “professional, knowledgeable and sensitive to my needs during this distressing case. A joy to work with”.
Chambers and Partners also record that Simon Pimlott "communicates effectively and swiftly" and "works in a highly professional and client-focused way," according to commentators.
Contact our specialist sexual assault lawyers today
Contact our no win, no fee sexual assaults solicitors now, for advice on how to make a claim for the harm caused by sexual assaults, or to simply consider what options and possibilities are available, without any obligation. Call us today on 0333 123 9099, email firstname.lastname@example.org or fill in our online form.